Tuesday, December 06, 2005


The ICAEW has written to all its members today, to tell us that has hired MORI to conduct research into why the consolidation vote failed.


"Equally we need to understand why the minority who voted 'no' did so in order that we can regain your support for what we are trying to achieve as a professional body. Over the next few weeks we will be working with MORI on a short piece of member research which will examine why you voted as you did in order to help us with this analysis."

I wonder how much this research will cost, and why it is needed now that the merger issue has been finally put to rest?

Good money after bad!

Friday, December 02, 2005

Message To Editor Of Accountancy

December 2005 edition, Page 37 quote:

"..,while 65.7% of ICAEW members backed the (merger) proposal."

29% actually.

Get it right!

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Chaos At The ICAEW

I read with interest today the story in Accountancy Age, concerning the delay in the new ICAEW syllabus.

The new syllabus was meant to have been implemented in 2006, yet will now be postponed until 2007.

The rumour, printed in Accountancy Age, is that the delay is due to staff turnover; rather than a coherent strategy.

The story is of particular interest to me because in September the ICAEW advertised for professionals, interested in acting as examiners for the new syllabus; the advertisement noted that it would go live in 2006. The work would be for a few days a year.

There were to be 12 modules; one of which, Ethics (a new subject), I applied for.

I take a particular interest in ethics and corporate governance, and feel that these areas in many companies need some serious attention. Ethics is something that should be of great importance to the ICAEW as well:
  • The ethical image and reputation of the profession has been badly undermined by the media coverage of eg Enron, WorldCom, Andersens etc

  • The ICAEW needs to publicly display to the world that it is committed to ethics and integrity

  • Including Ethics as a specific subject in the examination syllabus is an ideal method to send a message to the media, and the world, that we take ethics seriously

  • Not to include it in the syllabus is an opportunity wasted (to say the least)
I was invited for interview on 19th October, along with 24 other candidates who had applied for the other 11 papers. Prior to the interview I was sent the 5 page Ethics syllabus to read through, together with some other information and a training disc.

I had a one to one 20 minute interview, then a 45 minute panel interview. Seemingly I was the only person to specify Ethics as my first/only choice of paper.

I was told that I would hear by the end of the month, and that if chosen I would have to make a decision quickly; as work on the paper would start in November.

I received an email on the 1st of November which stated that since the interviews the ICAEW had rethought the approach to Ethics, and that there may well not be an assessment of the kind envisaged.

As such no Ethics exam team would be appointed.

I found the change of heart, in such a short space of time, to be surprising and odd at the time. Hardly indicative of a well thought through strategy, given the time and money spent in preparing the syllabus, advertising and interviewing candidates.

Changing the syllabus within the space of a fortnight, seemed to me as though the ICAEW was making up policy as it went along.

Clearly, in the light of today's report, there is chaos within the ICAEW. The result being that not only are the current members being let down, but those who are studying for qualification, and the industries in which they hope to serve, are being let down as well.

This is a very sorry state of affairs indeed.